Flock: A Company Caught in a Web of Permit Violations

In the pursuit of reducing crime and enhancing public safety, technology has emerged as a powerful ally for law enforcement agencies. Among the various technological advancements, Flock Safety has gained prominence with its AI-powered license plate readers, promising to revolutionize crime prevention. However, the company’s rapid expansion has been marred by a series of permit violations across multiple states, raising concerns about its adherence to regulatory frameworks.

A Trail of Violations: Unpermitted Cameras and Regulatory Oversights

Flock’s mission to combat crime has been accompanied by a string of incidents involving the installation of surveillance cameras without the necessary permits. These violations have drawn the ire of state transportation agencies and local officials, who are responsible for ensuring the safety and integrity of public infrastructure.

In Florida, Flock’s cameras were installed on the John’s Pass Bridge without the approval of the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). Despite repeated requests for removal, the cameras remained in place for months, prompting the agency to take action. Similar incidents have occurred in Illinois, South Carolina, Texas, and Washington, where Flock’s unpermitted deployments have raised concerns about the company’s disregard for regulations.

Permitting: A Vital Process for Public Safety

The permitting process for surveillance cameras is not a mere formality. It serves a crucial role in ensuring the safe and responsible installation of these devices. Permits are granted only after a thorough review to assess potential hazards, such as the risk of cameras falling and causing accidents or interfering with utility lines. By neglecting the permitting process, Flock has jeopardized public safety and demonstrated a lack of regard for established guidelines.

The Company’s Response: Excuses and Evasions

In response to inquiries about these violations, Flock spokesperson Josh Thomas has attempted to downplay the significance of the incidents, attributing them to occasional paperwork slip-ups and jurisdictional complexities. However, the sheer number of violations and the company’s repeated failure to comply with regulations suggest a systemic issue rather than isolated errors.

A Call for Accountability: Legislators Step In

The growing chorus of complaints against Flock’s permit violations has prompted lawmakers to take action. In South Carolina, State Representative Todd Rutherford has introduced a bill that would establish clear guidelines for the deployment of license plate readers, addressing the concerns raised by Flock’s unpermitted installations. Similar legislative efforts are underway in other states, reflecting the urgent need for oversight and accountability.

The Path Forward: Compliance and Respect for Regulations

Flock’s mission to reduce crime is commendable, but it cannot come at the expense of public safety and regulatory compliance. The company must acknowledge the severity of its permit violations and take immediate steps to rectify the situation. This includes obtaining the necessary permits for all existing installations, working closely with transportation agencies to ensure compliance, and implementing robust internal processes to prevent future violations.

Only through a commitment to transparency, accountability, and adherence to regulations can Flock regain the trust of state officials, local communities, and the public at large. The company has a responsibility to operate within the bounds of the law and to prioritize the safety and well-being of the communities it serves.